Problem Description
Given an undirected tree with n nodes (labeled from 0 to n-1) rooted at node 0, an array edges represents the tree structure and a 0-indexed array cost assigns an integer cost to each node. For every node, you must place coins on it based on its subtree:
- If the size of the subtree (node itself and all its descendants) is less than 3, place 1 coin.
- Otherwise, compute the maximum possible product of cost values from any 3 distinct nodes in that subtree. However, if the maximum computed product is negative, place 0 coins. Return an array coin where coin[i] is the number of coins placed at node i.
Key Insights
- Use Depth-First Search (DFS) from the root to process each node’s subtree.
- At each node, we need to calculate two types of candidate values from the entire subtree:
- The top three maximum cost values (to compute candidate1 = abc).
- The bottom two (i.e. the smallest) cost values (to compute candidate2 = smallest1 * smallest2 * largest).
- The answer for a node with subtree size at least 3 is the larger of candidate1 and candidate2, with a final check to return 0 if the maximum product is negative.
- Only tracking the top three maximum and bottom two minimum values in each subtree is sufficient to determine the maximum product without storing all node cost values.
- The DFS returns an aggregator (top 3 maximum list, bottom 2 minimum list, and subtree count) that helps merge results from child subtrees efficiently.
Space and Time Complexity
Time Complexity: O(n) since for each node we perform a constant amount of work (merging fixed-size lists). Space Complexity: O(n) due to the recursion call stack and the auxiliary data structures maintained for each node.
Solution
We perform a DFS starting from the root. For each node:
- Initialize aggregator with the node’s cost (both as the only member for maximum and minimum lists) and count = 1.
- For each child (avoiding the parent to prevent cycles), recursively obtain the aggregator (top three maximum, bottom two minimum, and count) and merge it with the current node’s aggregator.
- Merging simply involves taking the union of the current lists with the child’s lists and then selecting the top three maximum elements (by descending order) and the bottom two minimum elements (by ascending order).
- Once the entire subtree is processed, if the subtree count is less than 3, assign coin = 1. Otherwise, compute:
- candidate1 as the product of the top three maximum values.
- candidate2 as the product of the two smallest cost values and the largest maximum value.
- The coin value at this node is max(candidate1, candidate2) if it is nonnegative; otherwise, assign 0.
- Return the computed aggregator for parent's merging.
This approach leverages the fact that only a fixed number of candidates (3 maximum values and 2 minimum values) are needed to compute the desired product.