Problem Description
Given an integer array nums with distinct numbers, you can perform the following operations repeatedly until the array becomes empty:
- If the first element is the smallest element in the array, remove it.
- Otherwise, move the first element to the end of the array. Return the total number of operations required to make nums empty.
Key Insights
- The removal order is determined by the relative order of the elements when sorted in ascending order.
- Instead of simulating the process (which could be too slow for large arrays), calculate the number of operations needed using the positions of each element.
- Use a Binary Indexed Tree (BIT) (also known as a Fenwick Tree) to dynamically query and update the number of remaining elements to efficiently determine the “effective position” of an element in the circular array.
- Maintain a pointer representing the current start position in the effective (remaining) array.
- When processing each element in sorted order, calculate the cost (number of operations) depending on whether the effective position is ahead of or behind the current pointer (circular traversal).
Space and Time Complexity
Time Complexity: O(n log n) – O(n log n) for sorting and O(n log n) for BIT operations over n elements. Space Complexity: O(n) – for the BIT and additional arrays.
Solution
The approach is to process the removals in the order of increasing value. For each element (in sorted order):
- Determine its original index in the array.
- Using a BIT, compute its effective index among the remaining elements (i.e. how many elements before the given index are still present).
- Calculate the number of operations needed to rotate from the current pointer to this effective index. If the effective index is not reachable by just moving forward (because of the circular nature), wrap around.
- Add one additional operation for the removal itself.
- Update the BIT to indicate that this element has been removed, and set the current pointer to the effective index of the removed element (adjusting for wrap‐around). This design avoids an O(n^2) simulation in favor of efficient BIT queries and updates.