Problem Description
Given a list of items where each item is represented as [profit, category] and an integer k, the goal is to select a subsequence of exactly k items (preserving their original order) such that the "elegance" is maximized. The elegance of a subsequence is defined as the sum of profits of the selected items plus the square of the number of distinct categories present in the subsequence.
For example, if the subsequence has a total profit of P and contains D distinct categories, its elegance is calculated as P + D². You need to determine the maximum elegance that can be achieved.
Key Insights
- A greedy approach is used by first sorting the items in descending order of profit.
- Initially pick the top k items to maximize profit, but this may include multiple items from the same category.
- To increase the number of distinct categories (which adds D² to the elegance), try to replace duplicate-category items (using a min-heap to quickly get the smallest profit among duplicates) with items from categories not yet selected.
- The trade-off is between decreasing the profit slightly (by replacing a low-profit duplicate) and increasing the bonus from having an additional unique category.
- Sorting and heap operations ensure efficient swaps and profit updates.
Space and Time Complexity
Time Complexity: O(n log n) due to sorting and heap operations.
Space Complexity: O(n) for storing counts, the duplicate min-heap, and additional data structures.
Solution
The solution starts by sorting items in descending order of profit. Then, pick the first k items to maximize profit. Track the count of each category among the selected items. For items from categories that appear more than once, add their profit to a min-heap (this heap will help you quickly determine the candidate for replacement having the smallest profit among duplicates).
After this initial selection, traverse through the rest of the sorted items and whenever you find an item whose category hasn't been used yet, consider it as a candidate to increase the distinct category count. Replace a duplicate (extracted from the min-heap) with this candidate, updating the total profit and count of distinct categories accordingly. Each swap may improve the elegance by sacrificing a small profit loss for a potentially large increase thanks to the square term.
Data structures used include a min-heap (to track duplicate items for replacement) and a hash map/dictionary (to count frequency of categories). This combination ensures that the extra bonus from additional unique categories is maximized while affecting the profit as little as possible.