Problem Description
Given a string of moves (each being one of “N”, “S”, “E”, “W”) that describe a path from the origin on an infinite grid, you are allowed to change at most k characters (each change you can pick any of the four directions). As you traverse the string in order, you want to maximize the Manhattan distance (|x| + |y|) from the origin at some (intermediate) time. Find that maximum Manhattan distance that can be achieved after performing the allowed modifications.
Key Insights
- The original string defines a “prefix‐path” (positions after each move) on the grid.
- Without modifications each move contributes ±1 in one coordinate – the Manhattan distance after i moves is lower‐bounded by the “net” effect.
- When allowed to change up to k characters, you can “flip” moves that are “counter‐productive” (e.g. a west step when you intend to go east) or even convert moves from one axis to the other (e.g. a vertical move becoming horizontal).
- One good way to “boost” the distance is to choose a target quadrant (for example: “east–north” means we want x and y both to be nonnegative). Then, any move not consistent with that quadrant is a candidate for modification.
- Converting a move that is directly “against” the chosen direction (for instance, a W when we want east) gives a net change of +2 along that coordinate (because its original effect was –1 but after modification it contributes +1).
- Converting a move that originally affected only the “other” coordinate (say a vertical move when we need horizontal progress) gives +1 on that coordinate.
- For any prefix we can (conceptually) decide how many modifications to “assign” to fix the horizontal part and how many to fix the vertical part; after modification the best we can do is “simulate” a monotonic path. (Note that even if we could “fix” all moves then the maximum Manhattan distance in i moves is i.)
- Thus, for each prefix and for each of the four possible quadrant choices, we can compute the “base value” (the net distance without changes) and then see how many detrimental moves exist. Then by “allocating” a portion of modifications to horizontal and the remainder to vertical – prioritizing those moves that need a 2‐point “flip” (i.e. are directly contrary to the target) – we get a candidate Manhattan distance. (Finally, since every move is of unit length the best possible distance in a prefix of length i is capped by i.)
- Iterating over all prefixes and all quadrant assignments lets us answer the question.
Space and Time Complexity
Time Complexity: O(n)
Space Complexity: O(1) (apart from the input string; we only keep running counts for each prefix)
Solution
The idea is to simulate the path while “collecting” counts for each cardinal direction up to the current move. For each prefix (of length i) we record how many moves in that prefix went north, south, east and west. Then, consider each of the four quadrant “targets”: • For horizontal movement, either we want to go east or west. • For vertical movement, either we want to go north or south. For the chosen quadrant you decide: – The “favorable” moves that already contribute positively to the desired net. – The “detrimental” moves that go in the opposite direction. For example, consider target east for x. Let h_fav = count of ‘E’ and h_unfav = count of ‘W’ in the prefix. Then the “base” net horizontal is (h_fav – h_unfav). You can “fix” up to min(h_unfav, k) detrimental moves – each fix turns a –1 into +1 (a gain of 2) – and if modifications remain you may even convert some moves that originally affected only vertical motion (changing 0 into +1). Thus an “allocated” r modifications on the horizontal side give a horizontal displacement of horizontal_val = (h_fav – h_unfav) + 2 * min(h_unfav, r) + (r – min(h_unfav, r)). Similarly for vertical with its own counts. For a given prefix and quadrant we “optimally” allocate modifications (it turns out that a good choice is to use as many modifications as needed to fix the moves going directly against the chosen side – up to the available k – and then assign the remainder to flip neutral (other‐axis) moves). Adding the “modified” horizontal and vertical displacements gives a candidate Manhattan distance. (Remember to cap the candidate by i since in i moves you cannot exceed i distance.) We then update our result as the maximum candidate value seen over all prefixes and quadrant choices.
Data structures used include simple integer counters (for N, S, E and W) and a few temporary variables. The algorithm does only one pass through the string.
Code Solutions
Below are code solutions in four languages with detailed line‐by‐line comments.