Problem Description
A car starts at position 0 with a speed of +1. It can only execute two types of instructions: "A" (accelerate) and "R" (reverse). When executing "A", the car moves forward a distance equal to its current speed and then doubles its speed. When executing "R", the car reverses its direction (speed becomes -1 if positive, and +1 if negative) without changing its position. Given a target position, determine the minimum number of instructions required to reach that target.
Key Insights
- The problem involves non-linear moves where each accelerate ("A") exponentially increases the car's speed.
- You can overshoot the target and then reverse, so both overshoot and undershoot strategies must be considered.
- Dynamic Programming (DP) or memoized recursion can be used to avoid repeated work.
- For a given target, determine the smallest number of accelerations (k) such that (2^k - 1) is greater than or equal to the target.
- There are two cases: one where you exactly land on the target and another where you must reverse (or partially reverse) to correct the overshoot.
Space and Time Complexity
Time Complexity: O(target * log(target)) in the worst case due to recursive calls and iterating over possible reverse moves. Space Complexity: O(target), due to the memoization cache used to store intermediate results.
Solution
We use a memoized recursive (DP) strategy. For a given target, we compute the minimal sequence of instructions as follows:
- Find the smallest k such that (2^k - 1) ≥ target. If (2^k - 1) exactly equals the target, then k instructions ("A" repeated k times) are enough.
- Otherwise, consider:
- Overshooting: perform k accelerations to overshoot, then reverse, and solve the remaining distance recursively.
- Partial reverse: for each m in range 0 to k-2, perform (k-1) accelerations, then a reverse, then m accelerations in the opposite direction, reverse again and solve for the remaining distance.
- Choose the sequence with the minimum total instructions. This approach uses recursion with memoization to avoid recomputation and carefully explores both overshoot and partial reversal scenarios.